Article
Medicare's new payment model is built for AI, and most of the tech world has no idea
Neil Batlivala has spent seven years building a healthcare company that most of the tech industry has never heard of and that serves a patient population most of Silicon Valley ign…
Recovered historical entry. Original wording is preserved and has not been reverified as current news.
Neil Batlivala has spent seven years building a healthcare company that most of the tech industry has never heard of and that serves a patient population most of Silicon Valley ignores. But last month, that work put him at the center of something much bigger. His company, Pair Team, announced on April 30 it had been accepted into ACCESS - a Medicare program - as one of 150 participants chosen by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to test what AI-driven medical care could look like at federal scale. The program goes live July 5. The BotsFired read on Medicare's new payment model: this matters only where it changes a real workflow, budget, deployment constraint, or buyer decision. Model progress only matters when it changes the work people can actually ship. The hard question is whether the model improves accuracy, latency, cost, or tool use enough to change a production decision. For builders, the practical question is whether Medicare's new payment model removes a constraint that teams already feel. A launch is cheap; a default workflow is expensive to earn. Developers will test it against real tasks, not leaderboard language: messy prompts, long context, tool calls, regressions, and the cost of switching. For operators, the test is narrower: what work moves from manual judgment to repeatable system behavior, who approves the change, and what failure mode appears when the tool leaves the demo path?